Drawing for AUTOBAKE SERPENTINE BAKING SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 78194850

AUTOBAKE SERPENTINE BAKING SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2941565Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 19, 2005
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with AUTOBAKE SERPENTINE BAKING SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald E. Shapiro

Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Food processing apparatus and systems for heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying and ventilating, namely, commercial cooking ovens, dough proofers, non-portable coolers for cooling previously baked products and freezers; all for use in industrial and commercial food processing applicationsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 31, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 29, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 27, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 7, 2006COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 6, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Sep 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 27, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 22, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2004GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance