Drawing for SABATIER MAISON

USPTO serial 78194970

SABATIER MAISON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SABATIER MAISON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl M. Zielaznicki

KARL M ZIELAZNICKI C/O DOCKETING DEPT 600 PEACHTREETROUTMAN SANDERS LLPSTE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Cutlery, namely, kitchen knives and cleavers; stainless steel flatware, namely, knives, forks and spoons, serving knives, forks and spoons; non-electric vegetable peelers and manual can openersACTIVE—
021Bowls, serving trays not of precious metal, serving platters, ice buckets, porcelain dinnerware; stoneware dinnerware; ironstone dinnerware; bone china dinnerware; glass dinnerware; beverage glassware and beverage stemware; condiments set, namely, salt shaker, pepper shaker and jars for holding condiments; flatware caddy, napkin holders, paper towel holders, bread boxes, salt and pepper shakers, cheese plates, coffee and tea pots not of precious metal, pitchers, candlesticks not of precious metal, candelabras not of precious metal, napkin rings not of precious metal, storage canisters, charger plates, champagne buckets, ovenware, namely, ceramic and glass casseroles and baking pans; chopping blocks made of wood, glass or plastic; gravy boats and colanders for household use; serving ladles, spatulas, cake and pie servers, bottle openers, and household utensils, namely, gratersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 2, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 2, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 2, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 2, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 2, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 2, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 17, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2004GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance