Drawing for JOE.

USPTO serial 78195004

JOE.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JOE.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew D. Abell

MATTHEW D ABELL HOLLAND & HART LLP555 17TH ST STE 3200DENVER CO, 80202U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer and video game cartridges, discs, CD-roms, cassettes and tapes; video game software; pre-recorded motion picture and television films, audio tapes, video tapes and compact discs featuring fictional and computer game characters; motion picture films for broadcast on television featuring fictional and computer game charactersACTIVE—
028Hand-held unit for playing video games; toy action figures and action figure accessories; plush dolls; board games, action skill games, arcade gamesACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF MOTION PICTURE FILMS AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS FEATURING FICTIONAL AND COMPUTER GAME CHARACTERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 15, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance