USPTO serial 78195181
AMEEL S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMEEL S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katrin Lewertoff
KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and medicinal preparations and substances used in the treatment of heart disease; medicated, dietetic and nutritional preparations, supplements and substances for use in the treatment of heart health, namely, nutritional supplements, dietary supplements; vitamin and mineral supplements for use in the treatment of heart health; medicated chewing gum for use in the treatment of heart health; health-food supplements for use in the treatment of heart health, namely, food supplements, mineral supplements, nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement of heart health; medical food preparations for use in the treatment of heart health, namely , food for medically restricted diets; ingredients for use in dietary supplements used for heart health, namely, whey protein for use as a nutritional ingredient in various powdered and ready-to-drink beverages; dietary supplement drinks used for heart health; nutritional drink mixes for use as a meal replacement for persons with special dietary requirements; nutritional supplements in tablet form derived milk used to treat heart health; dietary food preparations based on milk used for heart health, namely, meal replacement and dietary supplement drinks; nutritional supplements in tablet form derived from milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | milk and milk protein for use as a food additive; milk, namely cow's milk, sheep milk, goat milk; milk powder, butter, milk based beverages containing lactic acid, fermented milk, eggnog mixes; jellies; dietary food preparations based on milk, namely yogurt and cheese; nutritional bars, namely, protein based, nutrient-dense snack bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | biscuits, candy, chocolates, cookies, caramels, non-medicated lozenges, pastilles, ice cream, sorbet, flavored ices, frozen yogurt; flour for food; cereal preparations, namely corn flakes, maize flakes, oat flakes, crackers, oatmeal, macaroni and spaghetti; bread, cocoa, cocoa based chips for use in making confections, cocoa mixes, marzipan, pancakes, pies, puddings; coffee, chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based, cocoa-based beverages, coffee-based beverages, cocoa beverages with milk, coffee beverages with milk; food and beverage additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or filler | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Calpis Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Calpis Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named AMEEL S
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |