Drawing for SOUND GALLERY

USPTO serial 78195238

SOUND GALLERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOUND GALLERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert P. Hart

ROBERT P HART HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES INC8500 BALBOA BLVDNORTHRIDGE, CA 91329-0001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio equipment, namely, loudspeakers, loudspeaker systems, AM/FM tuners, digital tuners, tuners, transducers, car radio receivers, audio cassette decks, audio cassette, compact disc (CD) and digital video disc (DVD) players, changers and recorders, loudspeaker horns, tweeters, woofers, mid-range loudspeakers, crossovers, amplifiers, preamplifiers, digital signal processors, sound processors, data processors, surround sound processors; telematics and automobile navigation systems, namely, global positioning systems, cellular communications, wireless communications, digital signal processing equipment, namely, an optical disk on which digitized maps, compressed voice records and computer programs are stored, and an optical disk player which operates an artificial intelligence routing algorithm which interfaces with the driver of the automobile voice input and output, radios, audio processors, loudspeakers, amplifiers, preamplifiers, and automobile cross-over circuits; parts and fittings for all the aforementioned goods.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 27, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance