Drawing for GOTLAND VODKA

USPTO serial 78195384

GOTLAND VODKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOTLAND VODKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages; namely vodkaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 22, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 29, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 24, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance