USPTO serial 78195545
LOUISIANA - TECH CAPITAL OF THE SOUTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LOUISIANA - TECH CAPITAL OF THE SOUTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond G. Areaux, Esq. (#33643)
Raymond G. Areaux, Esq. (#33643) CARVER, DARDEN, KORETZKY, TESSIER, FINN, BLOSSMAN1100 POYDRAS STREETSuite 3100NEW ORLEANS, LA 70163Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ASSOCIATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE INTERESTS OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 17, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Louisiana Technology Council Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Louisiana Technology Council Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LOUISIANA - TECH CAPITAL OF THE SOUTH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |