USPTO serial 78195616
ERGONOMIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ERGONOMIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Valerie Walsh Johnson
VALERIE WALSH JOHNSON BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN & CALDWELL165 MADISON AVE STE 2000MEMPHIS TN, 38103U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ceiling fans | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |