Drawing for PALE

USPTO serial 78195678

PALE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PALE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janis M. Manning, Esquire

JANIS M MANNING ESQ C/O CHRISTIAN R. ANDERSENVERIZON CORPORATE SERVICES GROUP INC600 HIDDEN RDG DRIRVING TX, 75038

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Prepaid calling cards not magnetically encodedACTIVEMay 13, 2005
036prepaid telephone calling card servicesACTIVEMay 13, 2005
038telecommunications services, namely, long distance telephone servicesACTIVEMay 13, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 12, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 25, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 5, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 31, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 7, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 17, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 17, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance