USPTO serial 78195799
PROFEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROFEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | ANIMAL FEED ADDITIVES FOR NON-NUTRITIONAL PURPOSES FOR USE AS FLAVORING, INGREDIENT, OR FILLER, AND ANIMAL FEED, NAMELY HIGH FIBER SOY PROTEIN TO BE USED IN ANIMAL FEEDSTUFFS; OKRA BASED FEED; HIGH FIBER SOY PROTEIN TO BE USED AS A DIGESTIBLE FIBER SOURCE THAT CAN BE A GOOD SUPPLEMENT TO CATTLE, CONSUMING FORAGE BASED DIETS, USED AS AN ECONOMICAL ALTERNATIVE TO CORN IN A LITTLE BASED DIET; BYPASS PROTEIN SOURCE IN THE NATURE OF THE BY-PRODUCT OF TOFU AND SOYMILK PRODUCTION, WHICH IS THE RESIDUAL, HIGH PROTEIN OKRA LEFT AFTER THE SOYBEAN HULLS ARE REMOVED AND EXTRACTED FROM SOYMILK; CHICKEN FEEDSTUFFS; AND SWINE FEEDSTUFFS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |