Drawing for ARGOS

USPTO serial 78195916

ARGOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ARGOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bernard Colas

JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IPTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Periodicals, research reports and printed material, namely, brochures featuring information designed to inform others of the products and techniques of treatment of spinal pathologies and the different means of objectively evaluating the efficiency of these products and techniques and to encourage all fundamental and applied research in the field of spinal pathologies treatmentABANDONEDMay 11, 1996
035Advertising services, namely providing advertising space in a periodical, promoting the sale of goods and services of others through the distribution of printed material and promotional contests, arranging of subscription of newspapers of others, document reproductionABANDONEDMay 11, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 24, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 24, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 24, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 1, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 25, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance