Drawing for INTELLIPHARMACEUTICS

USPTO serial 78195920

INTELLIPHARMACEUTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIPHARMACEUTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Drug delivery systems, namely controlled timed release and/or targeted release pharmaceutical compositions provided as an integral component of pharmaceutical preparations for humans; drug delivery systems, namely controlled timed release and/or targeted release pharmaceutical compositions, in the nature of oral solid dose tablets or capsules, provided as an integral component of pharmaceutical preparations for humans; pharmaceutical preparations for humans incorporating controlled timed release and/or targeted release pharmaceutical compositions in the nature of drug delivery systems as an integral component, all for use in the treatment of attention deficit disorders, central nervous system disorders, depression, diabetes, epilepsy, gastric disorders, gastro-intestinal tract disorders, hypertension, infection, inflammation, pain, rheumatoid arthritis and rhinitisACTIVE—
042Research and development services for others in the pharmaceutical sciences, namely the development and application of drug delivery technologies to the development of controlled, timed release and/or targeted release pharmaceutical preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 12, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 5, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance