USPTO serial 78195945
OPX2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3115905Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2006
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OPX2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janine Haines
Roy S. Gordet Law Office of Roy S. Gordet98 Battery StreetSuite 601San Francisco, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software featuring expert planning programs for use in the following fields-- project management; financial, human and material resource allocation and budgeting; maintenance planning and scheduling of corporate portfolios and projects, customized portfolios and projects, and industry-wide practices, namely, assessing ongoing projects and activities, accessing information needed to support executives' decision-making and focus on the following-- strategic business issues, ongoing budget allocations, ongoing prioritization, ongoing provision of information on current and forecasted business environments, and ongoing re-alignment of existing projects or activities resulting from changes or new decisions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1998 |
| 016 | computer program manuals and printed computer user guides for software featuring expert planning programs for use in the following fields-- project management; financial, human and material resource allocation and budgeting; maintenance planning and scheduling of corporate portfolios and projects, customized portfolios and projects, and industry-wide practices, namely, assessing ongoing projects and activities, accessing information needed to support executives' decision making and focus on the following-- strategic business issues, ongoing budget allocations,ongoing prioritization, ongoing provision of information on current and forecasted business environments, and ongoing re-alignment of existing projects or activities resulting from changes or new decisions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Planisware USA, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Planisware USA, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Planisware USA, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named OPX2
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |