USPTO serial 78195951
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francine M. Hanson
Alex C. Sears COOLEY LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Chinese traditional medicine health supplements; herbal supplements for medicinal purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | RRGG | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT - GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |