Drawing for GIANT EXPRESS

USPTO serial 78196178

GIANT EXPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIANT EXPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.THE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING NY, 10562

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Air courier services, which services include distribution of the goods to their intended recipientsACTIVEJan 22, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2008MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jul 23, 2008ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Oct 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 30, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2007PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Jun 1, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 1, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 9, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Nov 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 5, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 5, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 11, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 8, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 29, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 28, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance