USPTO serial 78196247
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott K. Haight
SCOTT K HAIGHT BUTLER, SNOW, O'MARA, STEVENS & CANNADAPO BOX 171443MEMPHIS TN, 38187 1443U.S. ARMY| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Commercial and industrial cooking equipment, namely; electric and gas steam jacketed kettles; electric and gas tilted braising pan; electric and gas convection steamers; electric and gas connectionless steamers; electric and gas boilerless steamers; combination ovens; kitchen faucets; steam pressure regulating valves;plumbing fittings, namely; kitchen steam traps and components therefor; kettle lids; plumbing fittings in the nature of kitchen sink strainers; water treatment equipment, namely; cartridge filtration units; all being for commercial and industrial cooking purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Quick-disconnect rubber gas hoses for commercial and industrial cooking purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Wire shelves as an accessory for commercial and industrial cooking equipment;commercial and industrial cooking equipment, namely; steamer baskets; steamer basket insert; lip strainers; disk strainers; perforated strainer; wire pan carriers;cookware in the nature of tilted braising pans pan and tray racks; castors in the nature of condiment stands; kitchen valve cleaning brush kits comprised primarily of cleaning brushes; all being for commercial and industrial cooking purposes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |