Drawing for VITAL FRUIT

USPTO serial 78196371

VITAL FRUIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITAL FRUIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew R. Basile

ANDREW R BASILE YOUNG & BASILE, PC3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BEVERAGES, NAMELY, FLAVORED AND NON-FLAVORED SPARKLING WATER AND SPRING WATER; CAFFEINATED AND NON-CAFFEINATED DRINKS, NAMELY, SOFT DRINKS WITH OR WITHOUT FRUIT FLAVORINGS; SMOOTHIESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2007DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 23, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 18, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 2, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance