USPTO serial 78196579
PURE SOFTNESS PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2912680Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 21, 2004
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PURE SOFTNESS PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John R. Harris
John R. Harris Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP3343 Peachtree Rd, N.E.1600 Atlanta Financial CenterAtlanta, GA 30326Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Toilet paper and facial tissue | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S&S BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BI-LO Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BI-LO Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BI-LO Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named PURE SOFTNESS PLUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY NOT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |