USPTO serial 78196739
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arlene D. Hanks
ARLENE D HANKS MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC2200 W MAIN ST STE 800DURHAM NC, 27705U.S. ARMY| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Containers made of metal, wire containers, cage-structures, bastions and gabions of metal; metal cages and walls for holding particulate material, namely, snow, sand, mud, stone, building rubble, or concrete used for constructing earthen, barrier or defense walls.; Containers made of metal, wire containers, cage-structures, bastions and gabions of metal; metal cages and walls for holding particulate material, namely, snow, sand, mud, stone, building rubble, or concrete used for constructing earthen, barrier or defense walls. | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Bastion defense walls, bastion structures, containers for forming structures and receiving material therein, gabions, protective structures; non-metallic cages and walls for holding particulate material, namely, snow, sand, mud, stone, building rubble or concrete used for constructing earthen, barrier or defense walls.; Bastion defense walls, bastion structures, containers for forming structures and receiving material therein, gabions, protective structures; non-metallic cages and walls for holding particulate material, namely, snow, sand, mud, stone, building rubble or concrete used for constructing earthen, barrier or defense walls. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |