Drawing for DOJA

USPTO serial 78196833

DOJA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOJA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, AND NE1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA VA, 22314U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter, namely, catalogues, magazines, pamphlets, booklets, manuals, periodicals, leaflets, newsletters, informational flyers, printed teaching material, specifications, design layouts, and technical reading material in the fields of communication, handheld computers, personal computers, PDA, straps for handheld computers and PDAs, telephones, cameras, and computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 3, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 18, 2005PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 3, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance