USPTO serial 78196917
AFX GLOBAL ADVISORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AFX GLOBAL ADVISORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
South Portland, ME
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aaron D. Julien
AARON D JULIEN PERKINS, THOMPSON, HINCKLEY & KEDDYONE CANAL PLZPO BOX 426PORTLAND ME, 04112 0426Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ASSISTANCE TO INVESTMENT MANAGERS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS BY MEANS OF ONLINE COMPUTERIZED PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TOOLS, ONLINE COMPUTERIZED INVESTMENT TRADE EXECUTION, ONLINE COMPUTERIZED INVESTMENT TRADE CONFIRMATION, AND ONLINE COMPUTERIZED MUTUAL FUND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |