Drawing for THERMAL WAVE IMAGING TWI

USPTO serial 78196975

THERMAL WAVE IMAGING TWI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2812975Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 10, 2004
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with THERMAL WAVE IMAGING TWI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHELLE L. VISSER

MICHELLE L. VISSER Fishman Stewart PLLC800 Tower Drive, Suite 610Troy, MI 48098United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for acquiring, processing, converting, synchronizing and analyzing data obtained in subsurface non-destructive testing and inspection; thermal imaging equipment and systems composed of computer hardware and software, and infrared camera, heat source, computer and supplementary electronics, for acquiring, processing, converting, synchronizing and analyzing data obtained in subsurface non-destructive testing and inspectionACTIVEApr 30, 2000
042Custom hardware and software design and development for others; custom design and engineering of systems for non-destructive materials testing and inspection consisting primarily of hardware and software; non-destructive materials testing and inspection services for others; consulting services in the field of non-destructive materials testing and inspectionACTIVEApr 30, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2024NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2024RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 28, 202489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 28, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 1, 2024E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2023REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2014NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2014RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 21, 201489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 21, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 7, 201489AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Feb 7, 2014E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 10, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 2, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance