USPTO serial 78197239
LONNY'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LONNY'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.THE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG 80 SOSSINING NY, 10562U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Non-electric cooking utensils, namely woks, palette knifes, tjobeks, namely bowls in which to crush bray herbs and spices | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Instant meals consisting primarily of prepared meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; foodstuffs and ingredients, namely soy oil, tofu, green beans, tomato, tamarind namely, fruit of tamarindus indica, ginger, kemiri nuts, coconut milk, garlic, lemon juice, shallots, onions, cumin, bamboo shoot, shrimp paste, shrimp extract, pollack, beef, pork, chicken | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Sauces, namely condiments, seasoning, spices; instant meals consisting primarily of prepared rice, foodstuff and ingredients, namely bagels, soy sauce, coriander, leaf of the herb citrus hystrix, leaf of the herb pandanus amaryllifolius, lemon grass, chili pepper, green pepper, red pepper, curcuma, palm sugar, sambal oelek, kemiri nuts, coconuts, cardemon, clove, nutmeg, aniseed, sweet pepper, vinegar, cumin, bamboo shoot, caraway seed, pandan rice | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurants and catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hola Indonesia B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named LONNY'S
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |