USPTO serial 78197261
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LABORATOIRES DE BIOLOGIE VEGETALE YVES ROCHER
LA GACILLY, FR
Other trademarks owned by LABORATOIRES DE BIOLOGIE VEGETALE YVES ROCHER
LABORATOIRES DE BIOLOGIE VEGETALE YVES ROCHER
LA GACILLY, FR
Other trademarks owned by LABORATOIRES DE BIOLOGIE VEGETALE YVES ROCHER
LABORATOIRES DE BIOLOGIE VEGETALE YVES ROCHER
LA GACILLY, FR
Other trademarks owned by LABORATOIRES DE BIOLOGIE VEGETALE YVES ROCHER
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT H FINN
HERBERT H FINN GREENBERG TRAURIG PC77 W WACKER DR STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS AND TREATMENTS FOR MOISTURIZING, CLEANSING, VITALIZING, PURIFYING, MATTIFYING, AND IMPROVING THE APPEARANCE OF THE BODY AND FACE, NAMELY CREAMS, LOTIONS, MILKS, TONERS, GELS, EMULSIONS, FOAMS, MASKS, FLUIDS, SCRUBS AND PATCHES; NON-MEDICATED ANTI-WRINKLE, ANTI-BLEMISH AND ANTI-AGING PREPARATIONS AND WRINKLE REDUCERS; CREAMS, LOTIONS, FLUIDS, GELS, AND PATCHES FOR CELLULITE REDUCTION; NON-MEDICATED BATH AND SHOWER PRODUCTS, NAMELY BATH SALTS, BATH CRYSTALS, BATH POWDERS, BATH OILS, BATH MILKS, BATH GELS, BATH ESSENCES, BATH ADDITIVES AND SHOWER GELS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |