USPTO serial 78197337
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
1117 BM SCHIPHOL OOST, NL
Zeist, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.THE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG 80 SOSSINING NY, 10562U.S. ARMY| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Identification, checking and security equipment, and accessories, computer software for identification, checking and security equipment; computer software used in the fields of biometrics, authentication, identification, access control and security; equipment, installations, systems and parts for authentication;computer software for access control and security of goods and persons; electronic, magnetic or optic data carriers to be used for purposes of identification, authentication and security | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Administration of business payroll for others; Publicity agents; Consultation services regarding the buying, selling and marketing of goods and services in the fields of authentication, identification, access control and security;Commercial management assistance services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications consultation for companies that provide identification, checking and security services; Electronic transmission of documents featuring encryption and decryption | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design and development for others in the fields of biometrics, authentication, identification, access control and security; Computer software consultation for those in the fields of biometrics, authentication,identification, access control and security | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Providing user authentication services in e-commerce transactions; Monitoring of computer systems for security purposes; Monitoring security systems; Security printing, namely, encoding identification information on valuable documents and products; On-line monitoring, namely, video monitoring of facilities, viewable through a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |