Drawing for AMERICAN IDOL

USPTO serial 78197512

AMERICAN IDOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICAN IDOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Heller, Jennifer B. Hodulik and Christina Liu

Susan L. Heller Greenberg Traurig, LLP2450 Colorado Avenue, Suite 400ESanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Musical instruments, carrying cases for musical instruments, musical instrument stands, kazoos, keyboard instruments, music boxes, music pitch pipes, music synthesizers, bows for musical instruments, catgut for musical instruments, conductor's batons, drumsticks, guitar strings, guitar picks, guitar straps, musical keyboard carrying cases, perforated music rolls for use in player pianos, reeds for use in woodwind mouthpieces, rosin for stringed musical instruments, sheet music stands, snare wires for use with snare drums, stands for musical instruments, tuners for musical instruments, tuning forks, valves for musical instrumentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 9, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 9, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 9, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 12, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 11, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 9, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 11, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance