USPTO serial 78197752
HACKPROOF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 1, 2005
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HACKPROOF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen Lesavich
STEPHEN LESAVICH LESAVICH HIGH-TECH LAW GROUP, PCSTE 112039 S LASALLE STCHICAGO IL, 60603U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer security services, namely, intrusion detection assessment, intrusion control and recovery, computer security risk management, security architecture design and review, security research and development, encryption, authentication and privacy protection on computer networks and the Internet; and the development of computer security software for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |