USPTO serial 78197776
MCBLONDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MCBLONDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Clemente, CA
San Clemente, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Skateboard equipment, namely boards, wheels, mounting hardware, riser pads, trucks, bearings, grip tape and skateboard wax; snowboard equipment, namely snowboards, snowboard bindings, face masks for snowboarding, snow saucers, snow sleds for recreational use and snowboard wax; surf equipment, namely surfboards, surfboard fins, surfboard leashes, surf fins, fin leashes, surfboard bags, longboards, shortboards, wakeboards, skimboards, bodyboards, boogie boards and surf wax; ski equipment, namely skis, ski bindings and parts thereof, snow skates, inline skis, ski brakes, ski edges, ski poles, ski ropes, ski scrapers, snow shoes and ski wax; skating equipment, namely inline skates, aggressive skates, roller skates and their component parts thereof, namely boots, chassises, brakes, grind plates, wheels, bearings, mounting hardware and skate wax; ice skate equipment, namely figure skates, speed skates, hockey skates, hockey gloves, hockey pucks, hockey sticks, boots, blades and sharpeners and component parts and accessories for all the foregoing | ABANDONED | Dec 24, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |