Drawing for PASHA'S

USPTO serial 78197975

PASHA'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PASHA'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank Rodriguez

Frank Rodriguez Corporate Creations P.A.11380 Prosperity Farms Road, Suite 221EPalm Beach Gardens, FL 33410UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meats and processed foods, namely milk, dairy-based beverages, cheese, cheese spreads, cream cheese, cheese substitutes, chocolate food beverages, vegetable-based spreads, dairy- based dips, edible oil, frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, or poultry, fish, lentils, meat, mincemeat, olives, snack dips excluding salsa and other sauces used as dip, yogurt, soups and tahiniACTIVE—
030Staple foods, namely bagels, bakery goods, mixes for making bakery products, barbecue sauce, herbal food beverages, bread, bread sticks, burritos, cakes and pies, chips, coffee, cookies, couscous, custards, dough, doughnuts, egg rolls, empanadas, flavoring syrup, fillo dough, frozen dough, pastries, frozen yogurt, halvah, processed herbs, ice cream, marinades, marzipan, molasses, pasta, almond paste, pita bread, pizza, pizza crust, pizza dough, puddings, ravioli, rice, salad dressings, semolina, shakes, sorbet, spices, syrup flavoring, tea, tea-based beverages, wafers and tortillasACTIVE—
032Light beverages, namely soft drinks, mineral water, drinking water, concentrates, syrups and powders used in the preparation of beveragesACTIVE—
043RestaurantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 3, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 25, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 26, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 4, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 26, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 26, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 26, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 21, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 24, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance