USPTO serial 78197982
BEYOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEYOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lake Forest, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol Anne Been
CAROL ANNE BEEN PO BOX#061080WACKER DRIVE STATIONSEARS TSONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHALCHICAGO IL, 60606 1080U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES, NAMELY CONTROLLERS FOR NETWORKING HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES; RADIOS INCORPORATING CLOCKS; TELEPHONES; CORDLESS TELEPHONES; SCALES, HOME SECURITY ALARMS AND MONITORS; ELECTRIC HAIR STYLING WANDS; ELECTRIC HAIR CURLING IRONS; ELECTRIC HAIR CRIMPING IRONS; ELECTRIC HAIR WAVING IRONS; ELECTRIC FLAT IRONS; ELECTRIC HAIR BLOWCURLERS; ELECTRIC HAIR STYLING BRUSHES; ELECTRIC APPLIANCES, NAMELY, ELECTRIC HEATING RODS FOR HAIR CURLERS AND HEAT-RETAINING ROLLERS FOR USE THEREWITH; PARTS AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 8, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |