USPTO serial 78197989
BEYOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEYOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lake Forest, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol Anne Been
CAROL ANNE BEEN PO BOX#061080WACKER DRIVE STATIONSEARS TSONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHALCHICAGO IL, 60606 1080U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electric household kitchen appliances, namely, ovens, microwave ovens, convection ovens, toaster ovens, toasters, grills, electric slow cookers, roasters, coffee makers and bread makers; hand held electric hair dryers, commercial and stationary hair dryers; whirlpool baths for feet; heat and steam facial saunas; portable electric water heaters and aerators for washing and refreshing feet for domestic use; parts and replacement parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 29, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 16, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |