Drawing for PHITEN SUN-FIELD

USPTO serial 78198048

PHITEN SUN-FIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHITEN SUN-FIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacey R. Halpern

STACEY R HALPERN KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE CA, US 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001CHEMICALS, NAMELY, PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS AND FERTILIZERS FOR AGRICULTURAL USEACTIVE—
007AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY, NAMELY, PLOWS, CULTIVATORS, HARVESTERS, FEED COMPRESSORS, FEED CUTTERS, FEED BLENDERS, FEED GRINDERS AND FEED DRYERSACTIVE—
008MANUALLY DRIVEN HAND IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, HOES, PLOWS AND RAKESACTIVE—
017PLASTIC FILMS FOR PACKAGING AND WRAPPING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS AND COVERING AGRICULTURAL CROPSACTIVE—
037REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF PLOWING MACHINERY, CULTIVATING MACHINERY, HARVESTING MACHINERY, FEED COMPRESSORS, FEED CUTTERS, FEED BLENDERS AND FEED GRINDERSACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE; SCIENTIFIC EXAMINATION, INSPECTION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELDS OF AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND FISHERIES; AND PRODUCT RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERYACTIVE—
044LEASING OF FARMING MACHINERYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2004COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 8, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2004FAXXFAX SENT—
Sep 21, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 21, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2003PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance