USPTO serial 78198193
ELLE ELLE BEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELLE ELLE BEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia M. Mathers
PATRICIA M MATHERS BOHAN MATHERS & ASSOCIATES LLCPO BOX 17707PORTLAND, ME 04112-8707UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, chocolate, food flavorings being non-essential oils, flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |