USPTO serial 78198229
DIMPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIMPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toyonaka-shi, Osaka, JP
Toyonaka-shi, Osaka, JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Use in Commerce) and (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) ELECTRONIC GAME PROGRAMS, VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE, COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS, INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA COMPUTER GAME PROGRAM, COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE, COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE THAT MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2002 |
| 041 | (Based on Use in Commerce) and (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER GAME, PROVIDING A COMPUTER GAME THAT MAY BE ACCESSED NETWORK-WIDE BY NETWORK USERS; (Based on Intent to Use) and (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE REVIEWS OF MOVIES, BOOKS, MUSIC, OR COMPUTER GAMES, SCRIPT WRITING SERVICES, CONDUCTING ENTERTAINMENT EXHIBITIONS IN THE NATURE OF GAME COMPETITION | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2002 |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) ANIMATION AND SPECIAL-EFFECTS DESIGN FOR OTHERS, GRAPHIC ART DESIGN, PACKAGING DESIGN FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER SITE DESIGN, DESIGNING GAME MACHINES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; (Based on Intent to Use) CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN, SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION, MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, REPAIR OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING WEBSITES FOR OTHERS, HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, DISPLAYING THE WEBSITES AND IMAGES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER, THE RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR USE WITH COMPUTERS AND GAME MACHINES, AND RENTING AN INTERNET SERVER; (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) ANIMATION AND SPECIAL-EFFECTS DESIGN FOR OTHERS, GRAPHIC ART DESIGN, PACKAGING DESIGN FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER SITE DESIGN, DESIGNING GAME MACHINES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS, CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN, SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION, MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, REPAIR OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING WEBSITES FOR OTHERS, HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, DISPLAYING THE WEBSITES AND IMAGES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER, THE RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR USE WITH COMPUTERS AND GAME MACHINES, AND RENTING AN INTERNET SERVER | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dimps Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Dimps Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIMPS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |