Drawing for THE NATURE OF BUSINESS

USPTO serial 78198308

THE NATURE OF BUSINESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE NATURE OF BUSINESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Whitelaw

JENNIFER WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL N 3RD FLNAPLES, FL 34103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Arranging and conducting business conferences; business consultation; business networking; conducting business research and surveys; conducting market research surveys; developing promotional campaigns for businesses; preparing computer slide transparencies for use by businesses; providing business marketing information; providing statistical information for business or commercial purposes; preparation of presentation boards and folders for business meetings; preparation of audio/visual presentations for use in advertising; preparing promotional and merchandising material for others; arranging and conducting business conferences; conducting marketing studies; business marketing consulting services; commercial information agency; cooperative marketing and advertising; direct marketing advertising for others; market analysis and market research; and providing information regarding all of the foregoing via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 24, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 22, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance