USPTO serial 78198446
LUSCIOUS-LITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3218519Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2007
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUSCIOUS-LITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AUSTIN G BOSARGE
LUSCIOUS LLC2940 VIA TOSCANASUITE 102CORONA, CA 92879Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, non-medicated lip balm, lip cream, lip gloss, lip stick, lip sheer, eye shadow, face powder, blush, bronzer, facial high lighter, body powder, nail polish, nail laquer | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2012 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |