Drawing for WHERE ONE BUSINESS FINDS ANOTHER

USPTO serial 78198594

WHERE ONE BUSINESS FINDS ANOTHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHERE ONE BUSINESS FINDS ANOTHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janis M. Manning, Esquire

JANIS M MANNING ESQ C/O CHRISTIAN R. ANDERSEN600 HIDDEN RIDGVERIZON CORPORATE SERVICES GROUP INCIRVING TX, 75038U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Telephone directoriesACTIVE—
035Electronic telephone directory services; advertising services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by means of telephone directories; dissemination of advertising for others via an online communications network; and promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing website links on a website accessed through a global computer networkACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, creating and maintaining specialized websites for others featuring website links to multiple business entities with e-commerce functionalityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance