Drawing for RED ALERT!

USPTO serial 78198801

RED ALERT!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3002537Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 27, 2005
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with RED ALERT!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CRAIG O. CORRELL

CRAIG O CORRELL4245 SUNNYHILL DRCARLSBAD, CA 92008UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009CONTINUOUSLY FLASHING LIGHT EMITTING DIODE WARNING LIGHTS TO DETER THEFT OR BURGLARY OF VEHICLESSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Sep 27, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 12, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 22, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 24, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2004CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 9, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 9, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance