USPTO serial 78198866
EMAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PERLA M. KUHN
PERLA M KUHN HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLPONE BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK NY, 10004U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application and programs for use in electronic notebooks and pocket PC, electronic publications, namely magazines about eroticism and adult entertainment, electronic devices, digital and analogical devices, namely digital versatile disc players, DVD players, stereo receivers, TVs and magnetic cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |