USPTO serial 78198978
OROGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OROGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CESENA FRAZIONE PIEVESESTINA (FORLI'), IT
CESENA FRAZIONE PIEVESESTINA (FORLI'), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT DUBNO
5676 RIVERDALE AVE STE 310BRONX, NY 10471-2100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen vegetable based side dishes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | frozen processed individual or mixed aromatic herbs; frozen meals consisting of alimentary pasta with tomato sauce and basil, frozen meals consisting of alimentary pasta with basil sauce, frozen meals consisting of alimentary pasta with vegetables, frozen meals consisting of alimentary pasta with cheese, frozen meals consisting of alimentary pasta with vegetable based sauce, frozen meals consisting of alimentary pasta with cheese based sauce, frozen meals consisting of alimentary pasta with fish based sauce, frozen meals consisting of alimentary pasta with meat based sauce, frozen meals consisting of alimentary pasta with vegetables and cheese, namely cannelloni and lasagna, frozen meals consisting of rice with vegetable based sauce, frozen meals consisting of rice with cheese based sauce, frozen meals consisting of rice with fish based sauce, frozen meals consisting of rice with meat based sauce, frozen meals consisting of rice with vegetables, frozen meals consisting of rice with cheese | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OROGEL SURGELATI S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by OROGEL SURGELATI S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named OROGEL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |