Drawing for Serial No. 78199293

USPTO serial 78199293

Serial No. 78199293

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78199293?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Alumit

JOHN ALUMIT PATEL & ALUMIT PC16830 VENTURA BLVD STE 360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Belt Buckles not of precious metal for personal wear around the torsoACTIVEFeb 26, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 28, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 19, 2006LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Apr 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 23, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 17, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance