Drawing for KB-AIM THE APPLICATION KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTION

USPTO serial 78199426

KB-AIM THE APPLICATION KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KB-AIM THE APPLICATION KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

HERBERT DUBNO KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE STE 310BRONX RIVERDALE, NY 10471-0900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application MI2002C00761) Computer software for use in privacy protection in the fields of application knowledge mining, data quality assurance and error prevention, data monitoring, data balancing, application re-engineering projections and special handling of dataACTIVE—
038(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application MI2002C00761) ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES VIA COMPUTER TERMINAL; ELECTRONIC STORE-AND-FORWARD MESSAGING; DELIVERY OF MESSAGES BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; ELECTRONIC VOICE MESSAGING, NAMELY, THE RECORDING AND SUBSEQUENT TRANSMISSION OF VOICE MESSAGES BY TELEPHONE; RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT IN GENERAL; VIDEO TELECONFERENCING; TELEVISION BROADCASTING; AND VIDEOTEXT SERVICESACTIVE—
042(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application MI2002C00761) Rental of computers and software, computer consultation utilizing a computer database in the field of government of business data in terms of data understanding, cataloguing, transformation and monitoring and solutions aimed at solving the problem of preventive measures for the protection of computer privacy, with special reference to test environments; updating of computer software, computer programming for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2018FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Dec 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2006FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Oct 27, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Sep 15, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 12, 2006OTHECASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION—
Jul 12, 2006IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jun 20, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 10, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance