USPTO serial 78199426
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
HAL KNOWLEDGE SOLUTIONS S.P.A. with abbreviation: HAL KS S.P.A.
Milano, IT
Other trademarks owned by HAL KNOWLEDGE SOLUTIONS S.P.A. with abbreviation: HAL KS S.P.A.
HAL KNOWLEDGE SOLUTIONS S.P.A. with abbreviation: HAL KS S.P.A.
Milano, IT
Other trademarks owned by HAL KNOWLEDGE SOLUTIONS S.P.A. with abbreviation: HAL KS S.P.A.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT DUBNO
HERBERT DUBNO KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE STE 310BRONX RIVERDALE, NY 10471-0900UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application MI2002C00761) Computer software for use in privacy protection in the fields of application knowledge mining, data quality assurance and error prevention, data monitoring, data balancing, application re-engineering projections and special handling of data | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application MI2002C00761) ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES VIA COMPUTER TERMINAL; ELECTRONIC STORE-AND-FORWARD MESSAGING; DELIVERY OF MESSAGES BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; ELECTRONIC VOICE MESSAGING, NAMELY, THE RECORDING AND SUBSEQUENT TRANSMISSION OF VOICE MESSAGES BY TELEPHONE; RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT IN GENERAL; VIDEO TELECONFERENCING; TELEVISION BROADCASTING; AND VIDEOTEXT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application MI2002C00761) Rental of computers and software, computer consultation utilizing a computer database in the field of government of business data in terms of data understanding, cataloguing, transformation and monitoring and solutions aimed at solving the problem of preventive measures for the protection of computer privacy, with special reference to test environments; updating of computer software, computer programming for others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |