Drawing for S3 PARTNERS

USPTO serial 78199477

S3 PARTNERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S3 PARTNERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J KEVIN GRAY

J KEVIN GRAY FISH & RICHARDSON PC1717 MAIN ST STE 5000DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, EVALUATE AND PUT INTO OPERATION DIGITAL INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAMS, EVALUATE THE DAMAGE OF EXISTING DIGITAL SECURITY BREACHES, TRACK AND TRACE THE CAUSE OF DIGITAL SECURITY BREACHES, AND PROVIDE TECHNOLOGY FIXES TO DIGITAL SECURITY BREACHESACTIVEApr 17, 2002
045LEGAL SERVICES, NAMELY, DISCOVERY ASSISTANCE IN THE FIELD OF GATHERING, RECLAIMING, PRESERVING, AND INTERPRETING COMPUTER-BASED FILES AND REVIEWING AND ANALYZING SAME, ASSISTANCE IN RESPONDING TO DIGITAL DISCOVERY REQUESTS, PROVIDING EXPERT TESTIMONY IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL EVIDENCE AND DOCUMENTATION, AND MANAGING DIGITAL EVIDENCEACTIVEApr 17, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 28, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance