Drawing for PINE STREET

USPTO serial 78199949

PINE STREET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PINE STREET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CLAUDIA W. STANGLE

CLAUDIA W STANGLE LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, private equity funds investmentACTIVEDec 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 2, 2004MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 2, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 2, 2004EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 4, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 7, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 2, 2003EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance