Drawing for 5 FIVE STAR ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN AN EDUCATIONAL PROJECT OF PUBLIC TELEVISION NETWORKS ALABAMA ARKANSAS GEORGIA LOUISIANA MISSISSIPPI

USPTO serial 78200278

5 FIVE STAR ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN AN EDUCATIONAL PROJECT OF PUBLIC TELEVISION NETWORKS ALABAMA ARKANSAS GEORGIA LOUISIANA MISSISSIPPI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3039868Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 10, 2006
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 5 FIVE STAR ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN AN EDUCATIONAL PROJECT OF PUBLIC TELEVISION NETWORKS ALABAMA ARKANSAS GEORGIA LOUISIANA MISSISSIPPI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A. Roberts

Foundation for Excellence in Louisiana Public Broadcasting, Inc.7733 Perkins RoadBaton Rouge, LA 70810UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed instructional, educational and teaching materials, namely, guides, brochures, and flyers all related to giving assistance to caregivers and/or children, such materials not being offered through retail mass merchandise outletsSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDMay 20, 2002
041Educational services, namely, providing a web site for the purpose of instruction to caregivers concerning going to school; production of video tapes and ten-part television program aimed at instruction to caregivers on going to schoolSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDMay 20, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2008C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Apr 16, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 1, 2008CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Nov 14, 2007PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 5, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 5, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 18, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 17, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 25, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 22, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance