USPTO serial 78200321
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seann W. Hallisky
SEANN W HALLISKY CHRISTENSEN OCONNOR JOHNSON1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-1344UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Quarry products, namely, crushed rock aggregates for the purposes of making concrete and paving products. | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail store services featuring quarry products, namely, crushed rock aggregates for the purposes of making concrete and paving products | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacture of quarry products to the order and specification of others, namely, crushed rock aggregates for the purposes of making concrete and paving products | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |