USPTO serial 78200529
CASUAL YANBAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CASUAL YANBAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marnie Wright Barnhorst
MARNIE WRIGHT BARNHORST ESQ THE TRADEMARK GROUP, APLC7850 IVANHOE AVELA JOLLA, CA 92037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cologne, Perfume, eau de toilette, eau de perfume, aftershave lotion; bath powder, face powder, talcum powder; shaving balm, shaving cream, shaving gel, shaving lotion; shower gel, skin clarifiers, skin cleansing lotions, skin emollients, skin lighteners, skin lotions, skin moisturizers, skin soaps, skin toner; toilet soap, liquid soap for face, hands and body; Bath Gel and Bath Foam Lotion; sunblock preparations, sunscreen preparations, sun tanning preparations; hair shampoo, hair conditioners, hair dyes, hair gel, hair care preparations, hair relaxing preparations, hair rinses, hair spray, hair mousses, holding gels and sprays, hair lotions; make-up; facial makeup, foundation makeup, lip gloss; cosmetic pencils; lipstick, lip pencil, eyeliner pencil and applicator, makeup removers, incense, facial cleaners, eye makeup removers; blusher, eye shadows, eye liners, eye pencils, mascara, lipsticks, non-medicated lip balm, lip pencils, nail enamel, nail enamel remover, nail strengthener; skin cleansing lotions, cold creams, massage oil, skin moisturizer, nail care preparations, nail grooming products, namely, tips, glue, lacquer and glitter, nail hardeners, nail polish, nail polish base coat, nail polish remover, nail polish top coat; body creams, body gels and body lotions; deodorant soap, personal deodorant. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |