Drawing for NATURALLY WELL

USPTO serial 78200604

NATURALLY WELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURALLY WELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter G. Mack

PETER G MACK FOLEY & LARDNERSTE 500WASHINGTON HBR 3000 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5143

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Newsletter in the area of naturopathic medicineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 19, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance