Drawing for FRATELLI DELI CAFE

USPTO serial 78200608

FRATELLI DELI CAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRATELLI DELI CAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Cone

JOHN M CONE AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPPO BOX 688DALLAS TX, 75313 0688U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring food and drinkACTIVE—
043Café and bar services; restaurant services, take-out restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 6, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 1, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 20, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance