Drawing for CONJECSURE

USPTO serial 78200691

CONJECSURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONJECSURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward A. Friedland

EDWARD A FRIEDLAND THE THOMSON CORPORATIONONE STATION PLSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, Internet-based business software in the field of financial portfolio risk managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 28, 2007EX1MSOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
Aug 28, 2007EX1DSOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Aug 28, 2007INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jun 5, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 24, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 26, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 4, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2004GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 24, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2003PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance